![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Therefore, given how close the decompression rate results of graphics processors are, it does not really matter which GPU is used - they are all up to the task and are generally good enough to significantly improve the gaming experience. In the best-case scenario, the A770 can transfer. Whether an AMD, Intel, or Nvidia GPU is used, actual loading times are reduced by an order of magnitude - from 5 seconds to 0.5 seconds, according to PCGH. Meanwhile, Intels Arc A770 is noticeably better than AMDs Radeon RX 7900 XT and Nvidias GeForce RTX 4080 regarding GPU asset decompression. In the best-case scenario, the A770 can transfer/decompress assets at a rate of 16.8 GB/s, whereas the RX 7900 XT comes third with a 14.6 GB/s rate (13% behind the leader). Meanwhile, Intel's Arc A770 is noticeably better than AMD's Radeon RX 7900 XT and Nvidia's GeForce RTX 4080 regarding GPU asset decompression. Both AMD and Nvidia have been pushing the envelope when it comes to computing and graphics for years now. El AMD vs NVIDIA en disponibilidad se lo lleva el equipo verde, pero por los pelos porque no ha ofrecido una disponibilidad tremenda. The first thing that strikes the eye is that all GPUs handle decompression at least 2.4 times better than the Core i9-12900K processor. NVIDIA narrowly edges out AMD in the performance-per-watt metric in their latest generations, but also for the previous few. Nvidia GeForce: A Quick History Recap ATI vs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |